In our I2 calculations, we found the bond distance and vibrational frequency for both the ground state and the excited state I2 were predicted fairly well, but our dissociation energies were incorrect. As mentioned, I2 has many electrons, and we were unable to use higher order methods, such as B3LYP, that include electron correlation. Let's treat the dissociation as a reaction. There are two possible reactions:
Reaction 1: F2 > F + F or Reaction 2: F2 > F+ + F-.
F2 bond distance _______________________
F2 vibrational frequency ________________________
F2 total energy _______________________________
F total energy _______________________________
F+ total energy _______________________________
F- total energy _______________________________
2. Calculate the net electronic potential energy change for dissociation for Reactions 1 and 2:
Reaction 1: ____________________________________
Reaction 2: ____________________________________
3. Repeat the above using B3LYP/6-31G(d)
F2 bond distance _______________________
F2 vibrational frequency ________________________
F2 total energy _______________________________
F total energy _______________________________
F+ total energy _______________________________
F- total energy _______________________________
4. Calculate the net electronic potential energy change for dissociation for Reactions 1 and 2:
Reaction 1: ____________________________________
Reaction 2: ____________________________________
5. Compare your results to those given in Table 16.2 in your text, and comment on the usefulness of better methods in determining dissociation constants.