Computational Chemistry at GVSU


F2 Dissociation Energy

In our I2 calculations, we found the bond distance and vibrational frequency for both the ground state and the excited state I2 were predicted fairly well, but our dissociation energies were incorrect. As mentioned, I2 has many electrons, and we were unable to use higher order methods, such as B3LYP, that include electron correlation. Let's treat the dissociation as a reaction. There are two possible reactions:

 

Reaction 1: F2 –> F + F or Reaction 2: F2 –> F+ + F-.

  1. Using HF/6-31G(d),
  1. calculate the bond distance, vibrational frequency, and total energy for F2 (remember to do an AM1 calculation first to get to a good starting point). Record these below.
  2.  

    F2 bond distance _______________________

     

    F2 vibrational frequency ________________________

     

    F2 total energy _______________________________

     

     

  3. For F alone, calculate total energy. (Why don't we have to do an AM1 calculation first?)
  4. F total energy _______________________________

     

  5. For F+, calculate total energy
  6. F+ total energy _______________________________

     

  7. For F-, calculate total energy.

F- total energy _______________________________

 

2. Calculate the net electronic potential energy change for dissociation for Reactions 1 and 2:

 

Reaction 1: ____________________________________

 

Reaction 2: ____________________________________

 

3. Repeat the above using B3LYP/6-31G(d)

 

F2 bond distance _______________________

 

F2 vibrational frequency ________________________

 

F2 total energy _______________________________

 

F total energy _______________________________

 

F+ total energy _______________________________

 

F- total energy _______________________________

 

4. Calculate the net electronic potential energy change for dissociation for Reactions 1 and 2:

 

Reaction 1: ____________________________________

 

Reaction 2: ____________________________________

 

5. Compare your results to those given in Table 16.2 in your text, and comment on the usefulness of better methods in determining dissociation constants.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Back
Computational Chemistry Home
Chemistry Department Home
GVSU Home